History of Scientific Change

What is history of scientific change? How should it be defined?

In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.

In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is:

• A descriptive discipline that attempts to trace and explain individual changes in the scientific mosaic.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this term (it includes all the instances when the term was accepted as a part of a community's taxonomy):

Community	Accepted From	Acceptance Indicators	Still Accepted	Accepted Until	Rejection Indicators
Scientonomy	1 January 2016		Yes

All Theories

The following definitions of the term have been suggested:

Theory	Formulation	Formulated In
History of Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015)	A descriptive discipline that attempts to trace and explain individual changes in the scientific mosaic.	2015

If a definition of this term is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

The following definitions of the term have been accepted:

Community	Theory	Accepted From	Accepted Until
Scientonomy	History of Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015)	1 January 2016

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this term.

Current Definition

In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is History of Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015).

History of Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015) states: "A descriptive discipline that attempts to trace and explain individual changes in the scientific mosaic."

To reconstruct the state of a mosaic at time t, it is necessary to understand which theories were accepted at the time, and which methods were employed at the time. 1p. 12 This process is the concern of historical (empirical) questions. Theory of scientific change, although closely linked is concerned with theoretical questions. History of Scientific Change is one of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance to recognize a descriptive theory of scientific change.

Ontology

Existence

There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of history of scientific changes.

Disjointness

No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.

Subtypes

No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of a history of scientific change.

Supertypes

No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of a history of scientific change.

Associations

No associations of a history of scientific change are currently accepted.

If a question concerning the ontology of a history of scientific change is missing, please add it here.

Dynamics

If a question concerning the dynamics of a history of scientific change is missing, please add it here.

Related Topics

This term is also related to the following topic(s):

• Mechanism of Method Employment
• Mechanism of Theory Acceptance
• Mechanism of Scientific Change