Disjointness of Outcome Accept
Revision as of 21:07, 24 December 2022 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Ontological Topic |Term=Outcome Accept |Ontological Question Type=Disjointness |Description= |Prehistory= |History= |Current View= |Page Status=Stub |Editor Notes= }}")
What other classes is the class of outcome accept disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with outcome accept?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | Disjointness of Outcome Accept became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Outcome Accept. That's when the first answer to the question, Outcome Accept (Barseghyan-2015) became accepted, which is an indication that the question itself became accepted as legitimate. | No | 29 November 2017 | Disjointness of Outcome Accept became rejected by virtue of the rejection of Outcome Accept. The term itself became rejected as a result of the acceptance of the new taxonomy by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan. For details, refer to the modification. |
All Theories
No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia.
If a theory stating the disjointness of outcome accept with other classes is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.
Current View
There is currently no accepted view concerning the disjointness of Disjointness of Outcome Accept.