Property:Acceptance Indicators
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is a property of type text.
C
This is when Patton and Al-Zayadi's [[Patton and Al-Zayadi (2021)|''Disciplines in the Scientonomic Ontology'']] that offered a definition of the term was published. This is a good indication that the question of how the term is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community. +
The definition became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the [[Modification:Sciento-2021-0006|respective modification]]. +
The existence of core theories became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the [[Modification:Sciento-2021-0006|respective modification]]. +
This is when Patton and Al-Zayadi's [[Patton and Al-Zayadi (2021)|''Disciplines in the Scientonomic Ontology'']] that offered a definition of the term was published. This is a good indication that the question of how the term is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community. +
D
It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018]]. +
The definition became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the respective [[Modification:Sciento-2018-0007|suggested modification]]. +
The claim became accepted as a result of the [[Modification:Sciento-2018-0006|acceptance of Barseghyan's redrafted ontology]]. +
The claim became accepted as a result of the [[Modification:Sciento-2018-0006|acceptance of Barseghyan's redrafted ontology]]. +
The question became accepted as legitimate with the publication of Barseghyan's [[Barseghyan (2018)|''Redrafting the Ontology of Scientific Change'']]. +
It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2016]]. +
It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018]]. +
It was acknowledged as an open question in [[Scientonomy Seminar 2017]]. +
The definition became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the [[Modification:Sciento-2021-0006|respective modification]]. +
The existence of delineating theories became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the [[Modification:Sciento-2021-0006|respective modification]]. +
This is when Patton and Al-Zayadi's [[Patton and Al-Zayadi (2021)|''Disciplines in the Scientonomic Ontology'']] that offered a definition of the term was published. This is a good indication that the question of how the term is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community. +
The definition became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]]. +
The existence claim became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]]. +
The association became ''de facto'' accepted together with the acceptance of the whole [[Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]]. +
It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2017]]. +
The definition became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the respective [[Modification:Sciento-2017-0001|suggested modification]]. +
