Difference between revisions of "The Status of Holism and Ripple Effect"
Maxim Mirkin (talk | contribs) m (Maxim Mirkin moved page Philosophy of Science - Ripple Effect to Theory Acceptance by Ripple Effect without leaving a redirect) |
Maxim Mirkin (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Topic Type=Descriptive | |Topic Type=Descriptive | ||
|Description=As an element undergoes modification, if we take a holistic approach to scientonomy, it seems respectively dependent elements should undergo change too. Our concern is whether this ripple effect will follow the same principles of scientific change as regular theories. Furthermore, these changes are largely dependent on our theory of meaning and whether we interpret it as sense or reference. | |Description=As an element undergoes modification, if we take a holistic approach to scientonomy, it seems respectively dependent elements should undergo change too. Our concern is whether this ripple effect will follow the same principles of scientific change as regular theories. Furthermore, these changes are largely dependent on our theory of meaning and whether we interpret it as sense or reference. | ||
| + | |Parent Topic=Mechanism of Theory Acceptance | ||
|Authors List=Paul Patton, Hakob Barseghyan, Liron Cohen, Calahan Janik-Jones, | |Authors List=Paul Patton, Hakob Barseghyan, Liron Cohen, Calahan Janik-Jones, | ||
|Formulated Year=2018 | |Formulated Year=2018 | ||
Revision as of 20:35, 15 February 2018
There appear to be cases where a change in definition may ripple certain changes in our synthetic propositions; are those changes subject to the same principles as scientific change?
As an element undergoes modification, if we take a holistic approach to scientonomy, it seems respectively dependent elements should undergo change too. Our concern is whether this ripple effect will follow the same principles of scientific change as regular theories. Furthermore, these changes are largely dependent on our theory of meaning and whether we interpret it as sense or reference.
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan, Paul Patton, Calahan Janik-Jones and Liron Cohen in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 15 February 2018 | It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2018. | Yes |
All Theories
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
Suggested Modifications
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
This question is a subquestion of Mechanism of Theory Acceptance.
This topic is also related to the following topic(s):
