Disjointness of Explicable-Implicit
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
What other classes is the class of explicable-implicit disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with explicable-implicit?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There are currently no classes accepted as disjoint with Explicable-Implicit in Scientonomy.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 28 December 2018 | Disjointness of Explicable-Implicit became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Explicable-Implicit. The publication of Maxim Mirkin's The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic is an indication of the acceptance of the term by the community. | Yes |
All Theories
No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia.
If a theory stating the disjointness of explicable-implicit with other classes is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.
Current View
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Explicable-Implicit.
