Indicators of Inconclusiveness

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to: navigation, search

What indicators enable us to identify a historical case of inconclusive theory assessment?

It is possible for a community to accept two theories which are mutually incompatible and not undergo a mosaic split. This question aims to identify which indicators can be used to identify a historical case in which a theory was assessed to be inconclusive, yet accepted nonetheless.

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Paul Patton and Nicholas Overgaard in 2016. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. At the moment, the question has no accepted answer in Scientonomy.

History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 April 2016It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2016.Yes

All Theories

According to our records, no theory has attempted to answer this question. If a theory on this descriptive question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

There is currently no accepted answer to this question.

Related Topics

This topic is a sub-topic of Mechanism of Mosaic Split.

Contributors

Hakob Barseghyan (12.0%), Jacob MacKinnon (88.0%)