Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance/Unacceptance of a Single Contender (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to: navigation, search

There is a series of inferences that can be made from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender.

Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance Unacceptance of a Single Contender (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png

Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance/Unacceptance of a Single Contender was formulated by Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard and Hakob Barseghyan in 2017.1

History

Acceptance Record

This theory has never been accepted.

Suggestions To Accept

Here are all the modifications where the acceptance of this theory has been suggested:
ModificationCommunityDate SuggestedSummaryVerdictVerdict RationaleDate Assessed
Sciento-2017-0006Scientonomy5 February 2017Accept the following set of inferences of theory assessment outcomes from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender and two contenders.Open

Question Answered

Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance/Unacceptance of a Single Contender (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is an attempt to answer the following question: What can an observational scientonomist infer about a theory's assessment outcome from the theory's acceptance/unacceptance?

See Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes for more details.

Description

The following inferences can be drawn regarding theory assessment outcomes from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender theory:

Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance Unacceptance of a Single Contender (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017).png

References

  1. ^  Patton, Paul; Overgaard, Nicholas and Barseghyan, Hakob. (2017) Reformulating the Second Law. Scientonomy 1, 29-39. Retrieved from http://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27158.

Contributors

Hakob Barseghyan (100.0%)