Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance or Unacceptance of Two Contenders (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)
This is an answer to the question Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes that states "There is a series of inferences that can be made from the acceptance or unacceptance of two contender theories."
Suggestions To Accept
|Modification||Community||Date Suggested||Summary||Verdict||Verdict Rationale||Date Assessed|
|Sciento-2017-0006||Scientonomy||5 February 2017||Accept the following set of inferences of theory assessment outcomes from the acceptance or unacceptance of a single contender and two contenders.||Open|
Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance or Unacceptance of Two Contenders (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is an attempt to answer the following question: What can an observational scientonomist infer about a theory's assessment outcome from the theory's acceptance/unacceptance?
See Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes for more details.
The following inferences can be drawn regarding theory assessment outcomes from the acceptance or unacceptance of two contender theories:
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
- Patton, Paul; Overgaard, Nicholas and Barseghyan, Hakob. (2017) Reformulating the Second Law. Scientonomy 1, 29-39. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27158.