Rejection of Data

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to: navigation, search

When data points are rejected as inaccurate, the First Law (perhaps via the Theory Rejection Theorem) would predict that those propositions are replaced by something. What are they replaced by?

Given our current understanding of theories, we may see singular propositions as theories. As such, if we observe anomalies or other such phenomena, descriptions of these phenomena are seen as theories. The First Law predicts that these theories must be replaced when rejected. If by chance these observations are mistaken or inaccurate and their respective propositions are thus rejected, what are they replaced by? For example, astronomical databases trivially reject inaccurate data points from their databases. Are these data points replaced by anything?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Maxim Mirkin and Sinan Karamehmetoglu in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. At the moment, the question has no accepted answer in Scientonomy.

History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy8 March 2018It was asked in the seminar and upon uniform agreement we accepted it as an open question.Yes

All Theories

According to our records, no theory has attempted to answer this question. If a theory on this descriptive question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

There is currently no accepted answer to this question.

Related Topics

This topic is a sub-topic of Mechanism of Theory Rejection.

Contributors

Maxim Mirkin (100.0%)