Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015)

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to: navigation, search

An attempt to answer the question of Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Bad Track Record which states "The failures of past theories of scientific change do not imply the inevitability of future failure or that the enterprise in inherently unsound."

Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.1 It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available theory on the subject.

History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 January 2016The theorem became de facto accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change.Yes

Question Answered

Response to the Argument from Bad Track Record (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question: How is scientonomy possible given the bad track record of previous attempts to create a general theory of scientific change?

See Possibility of Scientonomy - Argument from Bad Track Record for more details.

Description

XXXX

References

  1. ^  Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.

Contributors

Paul Patton (100.0%)