editor, Administrators
2,020
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Response to the Argument from Nothing Permanent (Barseghyan-2015) (view source)
Revision as of 15:29, 30 March 2017
, 15:29, 30 March 2017no edit summary
|Title=Response to the Argument from Nothing Permanent
|Theory Type=Descriptive
|Formulation Text=If there were indeed nothing permanent in science the , then scientonomy would be impossible, however, scientonomy posits only that their are regularities in the process of scientific change.
|Topic=Possibility of Scientonomy - The Argument from Nothing Permanent
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
