Tautological Status of the Law of Theory Demarcation

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to: navigation, search

Is the law of theory demarcation a tautology, i.e. can it in principle be violated?

As any law, the law of theory demarcation attempts to forbid certain courses of action, for otherwise it would lack any empirical content and would be a tautology. The question is whether the law is tautological or non-tautological, i.e. whether there are conceivable circumstances under which the law can in principle be violated.

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Ameer Sarwar and Patrick Fraser in 2018.

History

Acceptance Record

Our records state that this question has never been accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by any community.

All Theories

The following theories have attempted to answer this question:
TheoryFormulationFormulated In
The Law of Theory Demarcation is Not a Tautology (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)The law of theory demarcation is not a tautology.2018
If a theory on this descriptive question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

Here is a list of modifications concerning this topic:
ModificationCommunityDate SuggestedSummaryVerdictVerdict RationaleDate Assessed
Sciento-2018-0014Scientonomy28 December 2018Accept the law of theory demarcation as a new scientonomic axiom. Also accept questions concerning indicators of scientificity as legitimate topics of scientonomic inquiry.Open

Current View

There is currently no accepted answer to this question.

Related Topics

This topic is a sub-topic of Mechanism of Theory Demarcation.

Contributors

Ameer Sarwar (8.3%), Hakob Barseghyan (91.7%)