Theory Acceptance

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What does it mean to say that a theory is accepted? How should theory acceptance be defined?

One of the tasks of scientonomy is to explain transitions from one accepted theory to the next. Thus, acceptance is a key concept in current scientonomy. Traditionally, the terms acceptance, use, and pursuit have not been distinguished. Confusion between the three terms leads to serious misunderstanding, thus their clarification is of great importance.1p. 30

In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.

In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is:

  • A theory is said to be accepted by an epistemic agent if it is taken as the best available answer to its respective question.

Scientonomic History

The original definition of the term was suggested by Hakob Barseghyan in The Laws of Scientific Change.1p. 31 After the inclusion of normative propositions into the elements of scientific change by Zoe Sebastien, the definition was changed to apply not only to descriptive but also to normative propositions.2p. 7

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this term (it includes all the instances when the term was accepted as a part of a community's taxonomy):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 January 2016This is when the community accepted its first definition of the term, Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015), which indicates that the term itself became accepted.Yes

All Theories

The following definitions of the term have been suggested:
TheoryFormulationFormulated In
Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)A theory is said to be accepted if it is taken as the best available description of its object.2015
Theory Acceptance (Sebastien-2016)A theory is said to be accepted if it is taken as the best available description or prescription of its object.2016
Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2018)A theory is said to be accepted by an epistemic agent if it is taken as the best available answer to its respective question.2018
Theory Acceptance (Fraser-Sarwar-2018)An accepted theory is a scientific theory that is taken as the best available description or prescription of its object.2018
If a definition of this term is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

The following definitions of the term have been accepted:
CommunityTheoryAccepted FromAccepted Until
ScientonomyTheory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)1 January 201615 February 2017
ScientonomyTheory Acceptance (Sebastien-2016)15 February 20171 September 2019
ScientonomyTheory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2018)1 September 2019

Suggested Modifications

Here is a list of modifications concerning this term:
Modification Community Date Suggested Summary Verdict Verdict Rationale Date Assessed
Sciento-2016-0002 Scientonomy 3 September 2016 Accept a new taxonomy for theory, normative theory, descriptive theory to reintroduce normative propositions (such as those of ethics or methodology) to the scientific mosaic. Not Accepted Since this modification consisted of two interrelated but essentially distinct suggestions - one definitional and one ontological - it was decided by the community to divide it into two modifications so that the gist of the proposed suggestions is properly articulated. In particular, it was agreed that there are two modifications in "the heart of this single modification - one ontological, the other definitional".c1 It was also agreed that the current formulation "is exclusively definitional, and does not give the community an opportunity to appreciate (and, well, accept) the ontological changes that come along with it".c2 Consequently, it was decided to divide this modification into two modifications - one definitional and one ontological.c3 23 January 2017
Sciento-2017-0002 Scientonomy 23 January 2017 Accept a new ontology of scientific change where the two fundamental elements are theories - both descriptive and normative - and methods. Accepted The community has agreed that after the solution of the paradox of normative propositions, there are no obstacles for including normative propositions into the ontology of scientific change.c1 c2 c3 It was also agreed that including normative propositions into the ontology of scientific change "would allow us to grasp the role that methodological and ethical rules play in science".c4 15 February 2017
Sciento-2018-0006 Scientonomy 8 October 2018 Accept the new ontology of epistemic elements with, theories and questions are the two basic epistemic elements where and each theory is an attempt to answer a certain question, theories can be of three types – descriptive, normative, or definitions, and methods are a subtype of normative theory. Accepted Following a series of off-line discussions, a consensus emerged concerning this modification: it was agreed that the modification is to be accepted.c1 It was mentioned that most of the elements of this new ontology "has already been accepted by the scientonomic community".c2 It was also stressed that "the consensus has been manifested on several occasions, including the first scientonomy conference in May 2019 in Toronto, where several of the presenters treated this new ontology as accepted."c3 The fact that the consensus concerning this modification has been achieved primarily off-line, i.e. outside of the discussion pages of this encyclopedia suggests that the scientonomic "workflow must have a way of accommodating these discussions".c4 1 September 2019
Sciento-2018-0019 Scientonomy 28 December 2018 Accept the new definition of theory acceptance which makes explicit that accepted theories are a subset of scientific theories. Open

Current Definition

In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2018).

Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2018) states: "A theory is said to be accepted by an epistemic agent if it is taken as the best available answer to its respective question."

Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2018).png

This definition of the term makes it possible to apply the notion of theory acceptance to any subtype of theory. Unlike the previous definitions of the term, it doesn't imply any specific subtypes of theory, but explicitly states the relation between theories and questions they attempt to answer.

Ontology

Existence

In Scientonomy, it is currently accepted that "There is such a thing as theory acceptance."

Disjointness

In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Theory Acceptance.

Subtypes

In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted subtypes of Theory Acceptance.

Supertypes

In Scientonomy, the following supertype of Theory Acceptance is currently accepted:

Associations

In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted associations of Theory Acceptance.


If a question concerning the ontology of theory acceptance is missing, please add it here.

Dynamics

Mechanism of Theory Acceptance

In Scientonomy, the accepted answer to the question is:

  • If a theory satisfies the acceptance criteria of the method employed at the time, it becomes accepted into the mosaic; if it does not, it remains unaccepted; if assessment is inconclusive, the theory can be accepted or not accepted.


If a question concerning the dynamics of theory acceptance is missing, please add it here.


Related Topics

This term is also related to the following topic(s):

References

  1. a b  Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
  2. ^  Sebastien, Zoe. (2016) The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/26947.