Difference between revisions of "Template:Discipline"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
-->{{PrintTopicAcceptanceHistory<!-- | -->{{PrintTopicAcceptanceHistory<!-- | ||
-->|topic={{FULLPAGENAME}}<!-- | -->|topic={{FULLPAGENAME}}<!-- | ||
| − | -->|intro=Here is the complete acceptance record | + | -->|intro=Here is the complete acceptance record of the discipline:<!-- |
| − | -->|default=Our records state that this | + | -->|default=Our records state that this discipline has never been accepted by any community.<!-- |
-->}}<!-- | -->}}<!-- | ||
--></div><!-- | --></div><!-- | ||
Revision as of 12:15, 29 June 2024
This is the template for disciplines. This template is to be used for all scientonomic disciplines (e.g. scientonomy, theoretical scientonomy, observational scientonomy etc.). It is similar to the template for Definitional Topic, since disciplines too can have subdiscilpines and superdisciplines.
Note that, at the moment disciplines are registered as second order definitional topics. The motivation for this is the following:
- The discipline page should link the term itself to its definition, which is essentially the discipline's delineating theory.
- The delineating theory is a second order theory as it indicates first order questions as part of the discipline.
- The delineating theory is a complex theory consisting of individual claims of the form 'Question Q is part of discipline D'.
- Together these claims define the discipline.
It should be called in the following format:
{{Discipline
|Authors List=
|Formulated Year=
|Current View=
|Prehistory=
|History=
|Page Status=
|Editor Notes=
|Sorting Order=
}}
Edit the page to see the template text.
