Template:Discipline

This is the template for disciplines. This template is to be used for all scientonomic disciplines (e.g. scientonomy, theoretical scientonomy, observational scientonomy etc.). It is similar to the template for Definitional Topic, since disciplines too can have subdiscilpines and superdisciplines.

Note that, at the moment disciplines are registered as second order topics of the type Discipline. The motivation for this is the following:

• The delineating theory is a second order theory as it indicates first order questions as part of the discipline.
• This theory answers a second order question which is itself the discipline.
• The delineating theory is a complex theory consisting of individual claims of the form 'Question Q is part of discipline D'. Together these claims constitute the delineating theory of the discipline.

It should be called in the following format:

{{Discipline
|Authors List=
|Formulated Year=
|{{Core Question
|Discipline=Theoretical Scientonomy
|Core Question=Mechanism of Scientific Change
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton, Gregory Rupik
|Formulated Year=2016
|Description=
|Resource=
|Prehistory=
|History=
|Page Status=Stub
|Editor Notes=
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
|Accepted From Era=CE
|Accepted From Year=2016
|Accepted From Month=January
|Accepted From Day=1
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=The claim that the question of the mechanism of scientific change is within the domain of theoretical scientonomy became accepted with the establishment of the community and the discipline.
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Era=
|Accepted Until Year=
|Accepted Until Month=
|Accepted Until Day=
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
|Rejection Indicators=
}}
=
|Prehistory=
|History=
|Page Status=
|Editor Notes=
|Sorting Order=
}}

Edit the page to see the template text.