Difference between revisions of "The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015)"
m (Hakob Barseghyan moved page The Second Law is a Tautology (Barseghyan-2015) to The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015)) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Theory Type=Descriptive | |Theory Type=Descriptive | ||
|Formulation Text=The second law is a tautology. | |Formulation Text=The second law is a tautology. | ||
− | |Topic=Tautological Status of | + | |Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) |
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | ||
|Formulated Year=2015 | |Formulated Year=2015 |
Revision as of 21:02, 19 January 2023
This is an answer to the question Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) that states "Barseghyan's original second law is tautological."
The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.1 It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | The proposition became de facto accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change. | Yes |
Question Answered
The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) is Tautological (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question: Is Barseghyan's original second law a tautology?
See Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) for more details.
Description
According to Barseghyan's initial position, "the second law is not a law in the traditional sense, for normally a law is supposed to have some empirical content, i.e. its opposite should be conceivable at least in principle. Obviously, the second law is a tautology, since it follows from the definition of employed method".1
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.