Philosophy of Science - Demarcation
Revision as of 00:49, 19 January 2018 by Maxim Mirkin (talk | contribs)
Can descriptive Scientonomy solve the problem of demarcation?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 18 January 2018 | It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2018. | Yes |
All Theories
No direct answers to the question have been suggested. Note that the question might still have subanswers (answers to its subquestions) and superanswers (answers to its superquestions).
If a direct answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
No direct answer to this question has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
There have been no suggested modifications concerning direct answers to this question.
Current View
At the moment, the question has no accepted answer in Scientonomy.
Related Topics
This question is a subquestion of External Influence - Application.
This topic is also related to the following topic(s):
References
- a b Laudan, Larry. (1983) The Demise of the Demarcation Problem. In Cohen and Laudan (Eds.) (1983), 111-127.
- ^ Carnap (1936a)
- ^ Popper, Karl. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson & Co.
- ^ Lakatos, Imre. (1970) Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In Lakatos (1978a), 8-101.
- ^ Kuhn, Thomas. (1970) Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research? In Lakatos and Musgrave (Eds.) (1970), 1-20.
- ^ Feyerabend, Paul. (1975) Against Method. New Left Books.
