Nature of Appraisal

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Revision as of 15:03, 21 September 2016 by Jacob MacKinnon (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What is the nature of theory appraisal? Does actual theory assessment concern an individual theory taken in isolation from other theories?

Theory appraisal refers to how we assess two competing theories to determine which one to accept. In appraising any theory it must be considered in the context of its mosaic. Several elements must be considered in order to avoid committing anachronisms.

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There is currently no accepted answer to this question in Scientonomy.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 January 2016That is when the community accepted its first answer to this question, Contextual Appraisal theorem (Barseghyan-2015), which indicates that the question is itself considered legitimate.Yes

All Theories

The following direct answers to the question have been suggested:
TheoryFormulationFormulated In
Contextual Appraisal theorem (Barseghyan-2015)Theory assessment is an assessment of a proposed modification of the mosaic by the method employed at the time.2015

If a direct answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

The following theories have been accepted as direct answers to this question:
CommunityTheoryAccepted FromAccepted Until
ScientonomyContextual Appraisal theorem (Barseghyan-2015)1 January 2016

Suggested Modifications

There have been no suggested modifications concerning direct answers to this question.

Current View

At the moment, the question has no accepted answer in Scientonomy.


Related Topics

This question is a subquestion of Mechanism of Theory Acceptance.

References

  1. ^  Laudan, Larry. (1970) Commentary. In Stuewer (Ed.) (1970), 127-132; 230-238.
  2. ^  Laudan, Larry. (1968) Theories of Scientific Method from Plato to Mach: A Bibliographical Review. History of Science 7, 1-63.
  3. ^  Laudan, Larry. (1981) Science and Hypothesis. Historical Essays on Scientific Methodology. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
  4. ^  Laudan, Larry. (1996) Beyond Positivism and Relativism. Theory, Method, and Evidence. Westview Press.
  5. a b  Lakatos, Imre. (1970) Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In Lakatos (1978a), 8-101.
  6. a b  Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
  7. ^  Popper, Karl. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson & Co.
  8. a b  Kuhn, Thomas. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
  9. ^  Kuhn, Thomas. (1974) Second Thoughts on Paradigms. In Suppe (Ed.) (1974), 459-482.
  10. ^  Lakatos, Imre. (1971) History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions. In Lakatos (1978a), 102-138.
  11. ^  Laudan, Larry. (1984) Science and Values. University of California Press.