Property:Formulation Text
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is a property of type Text.
A
Criteria for determining whether a theory is ''acceptable'' or ''unacceptable.'' +
There is such a thing as [[Acceptance Criteria|acceptance criteria]]. +
An [[Acceptance Criteria|acceptance criterion]] is always part of some [[Method|method]]. +
Criteria for determining whether a theory is ''acceptable'' or ''unacceptable.'' +
A group that does not have a collective intentionality. +
A group that does not have a collective intentionality. +
The commentators of suggested modifications are allowed to suggest reformulations of the original formulations in the comments. By default, the new formulation should bear the original author’s name, unless the author decides to give credit to those who significantly contributed to the new reformulation. +
At the level of metatheory, the relevant evidence for assessing a scientonomic theory ''ought to be'' the facts relating to the state of the ''scientific mosaic'' and its ''transitions''. The complete list of relevant phenomena that ought to be considered can ''only'' be identified for a specific scientonomic theory. +
At the level of metatheory, the relevant evidence for assessing a scientonomic theory ''ought to be'' the facts relating to the state of the ''scientific mosaic'' and its ''transitions''. The complete list of relevant phenomena that ought to be considered can ''only'' be identified for a specific scientonomic theory. +
At the level of metatheory, the relevant evidence for assessing a scientonomic theory ''ought to be'' the facts relating to the state of the ''scientific mosaic'' and its ''transitions''. The complete list of relevant phenomena that ought to be considered can ''only'' be identified for a specific scientonomic theory. +
At the level of metatheory, the relevant evidence for assessing a scientonomic theory ''ought to be'' the facts relating to the state of the ''scientific mosaic'' and its ''transitions''. The complete list of relevant phenomena that ought to be considered can ''only'' be identified for a specific scientonomic theory. +
An [[Acceptance Criteria|acceptance criterion]] is always part of some [[Method|method]]. +
A [[Community|community]] can [[Authority Delegation|delegate authority]] to another community. +
A [[Compatibility Criteria|compatibility criterion]] is always part of some [[Method|method]]. +
An [[Demarcation Criteria|demarcation criterion]] is always part of some [[Method|method]]. +
An [[Acceptance Criteria|acceptance criterion]] is always part of some [[Method|method]]. A [[Compatibility Criteria|compatibility criterion]] is always part of some [[Method|method]]. A [[Demarcation Criteria|demarcation criterion]] is always part of some [[Method|method]]. +
A [[Question|question]] can presuppose [[Theory|theories]]. A [[Theory|theory]] is an answer to a [[Question|question]]. +
A [[Question|question]] can presuppose [[Theory|theories]]. A [[Theory|theory]] is an answer to a [[Question|question]]. +
The employment of new methods can ''be'' but is not ''necessarily'' a result of the acceptance of new theories. +
Community A is said to be delegating authority over topic ''x'' to community B ''iff'' (1) community A accepts that community B is an expert on topic ''x'' and (2) community A will accept a theory on topic ''x'' if community B says so. +
