Difference between revisions of "Epistemic Elements - Theories and Methods (Barseghyan-2015)"
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|Accepted From Approximate=No | |Accepted From Approximate=No | ||
|Acceptance Indicators=This formulation was tacitly accepted together with the rest of the original TSC. It was made explicit on January 16, 2017 when [[Nicholas Overgaard]] suggested that the question of ontology of a certain field shouldn't be answered via definitions alone. See [[Modification_talk:Sciento-2016-0002]] for details. | |Acceptance Indicators=This formulation was tacitly accepted together with the rest of the original TSC. It was made explicit on January 16, 2017 when [[Nicholas Overgaard]] suggested that the question of ontology of a certain field shouldn't be answered via definitions alone. See [[Modification_talk:Sciento-2016-0002]] for details. | ||
| − | |Still Accepted= | + | |Still Accepted=No |
| + | |Accepted Until Era=CE | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Year=2017 | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Month=February | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Day=15 | ||
|Accepted Until Approximate=No | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
| + | |Rejection Indicators=The ontology became reject when it was [[Modification:Sciento-2017-0002|replaced]] by [[Ontology of Scientific Change - Theories and Methods (Sebastien-2016)]]. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 04:01, 16 February 2017
that states ""
Epistemic Elements - Theories and Methods (Barseghyan-2015) was formulated by in .
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Question Answered
Epistemic Elements - Theories and Methods (Barseghyan-2015) is an attempt to answer the following question:
See for more details.
Description
According to Barseghyan, "at any moment of time, there are certain theories and certain methods employed in theory assessment".1p.5 Thus, theories and methods are the two types of elements that undergo scientific change; as such, they constitute the ontology of scientific change. Importantly, in this ontology, the class of theories only includes descriptive propositions; normative propositions (such as those of ethics or methodology) are left out of the ontology.
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
References
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
