Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Scientificity Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)
that states ""
Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Scientificity Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) was formulated by in .
Contents
Scientonomic History
It is accepted in scientonomy that epistemic agents may take a variety of epistemic stances towards theories, including acceptance, use, and pursuit. However, it is recognized that this list is by no means exhausitve.
Acceptance Record
Question Answered
Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Scientificity Acceptance Use and Pursuit (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) is an attempt to answer the following question:
See for more details.
Description
It is postulated by Sarwar and Fraser that in addition to the already accepted epistemic stances that epistemic agents may take towards theories, scientificity is a unique and independent stance that agents can also take towards theories.1 In particular, if a theory satisfies the demarcation criteria employed by a particular agent, then that agent considers the theory to be scientific. If the theory does not satisfy the its demarcation criteria, then the theory is taken to be unscientific. If assessment is inconclusive, the theory may be taken as scientific, unscientific, or uncertain. Sarwar and Fraser argue that scientific communities take the stance of scientificity or unscientificity independent of whether those theories are accepted, unaccepted, used, unused, pursued, or unpursued. As such, scientificity is a distinct epistemic stance.
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
Questions About This Theory
There are no higher-order questions concerning this theory.
If a question about this theory is missing, please add it here.
References
- ^ Sarwar, Ameer and Fraser, Patrick. (2018) Scientificity and The Law of Theory Demarcation. Scientonomy 2, 55-66. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31275.