Difference between revisions of "Fieser (2016)"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Bibliographic Record |Title=David Hume |Resource Type=collection |Author=James Fieser, |Year=2016 |Abstract=A full detailed account of David Hume and his ideas. |URL=https:/...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Bibliographic Record
 
{{Bibliographic Record
 
|Title=David Hume
 
|Title=David Hume
|Resource Type=collection
+
|Resource Type=collection article
 
|Author=James Fieser,
 
|Author=James Fieser,
 
|Year=2016
 
|Year=2016
|Abstract=A full detailed account of David Hume and his ideas.
+
|Abstract="Hume is our Politics, Hume is our Trade, Hume is our Philosophy, Hume is our Religion.” This statement by nineteenth century philosopher James Hutchison Stirling reflects the unique position in intellectual thought held by Scottish philosopher David Hume. Part of Hume’s fame and importance owes to his boldly skeptical approach to a range of philosophical subjects. In epistemology, he questioned common notions of personal identity, and argued that there is no permanent “self” that continues over time. He dismissed standard accounts of causality and argued that our conceptions of cause-effect relations are grounded in habits of thinking, rather than in the perception of causal forces in the external world itself. He defended the skeptical position that human reason is inherently contradictory, and it is only through naturally-instilled beliefs that we can navigate our way through common life. In the philosophy of religion, he argued that it is unreasonable to believe testimonies of alleged miraculous events, and he hints, accordingly, that we should reject religions that are founded on miracle testimonies. Against the common belief of the time that God’s existence could be proven through a design or causal argument, Hume offered compelling criticisms of standard theistic proofs. He also advanced theories on the origin of popular religious beliefs, grounding such notions in human psychology rather than in rational argument or divine revelation. The larger aim of his critique was to disentangle philosophy from religion and thus allow philosophy to pursue its own ends without rational over-extension or psychological corruption.
|URL=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hume
+
|URL=http://www.iep.utm.edu/hume/
|Publisher=University of Tennessee at Martin
+
|Page Status=Stub
|ISBN=.
+
|Collection=Fieser and Dowden (Ed.) (2017)
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 15:20, 29 March 2018

Fieser, James. (2016) David Hume. In Fieser and Dowden (Ed.) (2017). Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/hume/.

Title David Hume
Resource Type collection article
Author(s) James Fieser
Year 2016
URL http://www.iep.utm.edu/hume/
Collection Fieser and Dowden (Ed.) (2017)

Abstract

"Hume is our Politics, Hume is our Trade, Hume is our Philosophy, Hume is our Religion.” This statement by nineteenth century philosopher James Hutchison Stirling reflects the unique position in intellectual thought held by Scottish philosopher David Hume. Part of Hume’s fame and importance owes to his boldly skeptical approach to a range of philosophical subjects. In epistemology, he questioned common notions of personal identity, and argued that there is no permanent “self” that continues over time. He dismissed standard accounts of causality and argued that our conceptions of cause-effect relations are grounded in habits of thinking, rather than in the perception of causal forces in the external world itself. He defended the skeptical position that human reason is inherently contradictory, and it is only through naturally-instilled beliefs that we can navigate our way through common life. In the philosophy of religion, he argued that it is unreasonable to believe testimonies of alleged miraculous events, and he hints, accordingly, that we should reject religions that are founded on miracle testimonies. Against the common belief of the time that God’s existence could be proven through a design or causal argument, Hume offered compelling criticisms of standard theistic proofs. He also advanced theories on the origin of popular religious beliefs, grounding such notions in human psychology rather than in rational argument or divine revelation. The larger aim of his critique was to disentangle philosophy from religion and thus allow philosophy to pursue its own ends without rational over-extension or psychological corruption.