Difference between revisions of "Method"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m (→Current View) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Current View == | == Current View == | ||
+ | Method is currently defined as a set of criteria for employment in theory assessment. These criteria can be of three basic types: criteria of demarcation, criteria of acceptance, and criteria of compatibility. | ||
+ | <imagemap> | ||
+ | Image: Method_and_Types_of_Criteria_Class_Diagram.png|center|627px | ||
+ | rect 674 251 706 289 [[Wikipedia:Object_composition#Composition|This is a symbol of composition. It shows that a method can consist of criteria of three different types.]] | ||
+ | desc none | ||
+ | </imagemap> | ||
=== Criteria of Demarcation === | === Criteria of Demarcation === | ||
Line 17: | Line 23: | ||
=== Method vs. Methodology === | === Method vs. Methodology === | ||
− | |||
== Open Questions == | == Open Questions == |
Revision as of 18:35, 16 February 2016
Method is a set of criteria for employment in theory assessment. Three different types of criteria have been identified so far: criteria of demarcation, criteria of acceptance, and criteria of compatibility. Methods should not be confused with openly professed methodologies. Methods should also be differentiated from research techniques, which are used in theory construction and data gathering.
Contents
Prehistory
Prehistory here
History
Current View
Method is currently defined as a set of criteria for employment in theory assessment. These criteria can be of three basic types: criteria of demarcation, criteria of acceptance, and criteria of compatibility.
Criteria of Demarcation
Criteria of Acceptance
Criteria of Compatibility
Method vs. Methodology
Open Questions
• Question 1
• Question 2
Related Articles
Notes
References
- ^ Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. (2008) Systematicity: The Nature of Science. Philosophia 36 (2), 167-180.
- ^ Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. (2013) Systematicity: The Nature of Science. Oxford University Press.
- a b Andersen, Hanne and Hepburn, Brian. (2015) Scientific Method. In Zalta (Ed.) (2016). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-method/.
- ^ Newton, Isaac. (1704) Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light. Prince's Arms in St. Paul's Churchyard. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/opticksortreatis00newt.
- ^ Newton, Isaac. (1999) The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. University of California Press.
- ^ Berkeley, George. (1992) De Motu and The Analyst: A Modern Edition with Introductions and Commentary. Springer.
- ^ Hume, David. (2000) A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
- ^ Kant, Immanuel. (1781) Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Reichenbach, Hans. (1938) Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. Literary Licensing.
- ^ Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press.
- ^ Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve. (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. 2nd Edition. Princeton University Press.
- ^ Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon. (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton University Press.
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob. (2018) Redrafting the Ontology of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 2, 13-38. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31032.