Difference between revisions of "Modification:Sciento-2017-0007"
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Preamble=TODO: Sinan, please add the preamble | |Preamble=TODO: Sinan, please add the preamble | ||
|To Accept=Singular Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017), Multiple Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017), Hierarchical Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017), Non-Hierarchical Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017), | |To Accept=Singular Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017), Multiple Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017), Hierarchical Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017), Non-Hierarchical Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017), | ||
− | |Verdict= | + | |Verdict=Accepted |
+ | |Date Assessed Year=2018 | ||
+ | |Date Assessed Month=October | ||
+ | |Date Assessed Day=23 | ||
|Date Assessed Approximate=No | |Date Assessed Approximate=No | ||
+ | |Verdict Rationale=While the notions of ''singular'' and ''multiple'' authority delegation didn't cause much controversy, the notions of ''hierarchical'' and ''non-hierarchical'' authority delegation gave rise to notable disagreement among scientonomists. As a result, the modification was in discussion for about a year and a half.<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-90|c1]]</sup> Eventually, a consensus emerged mostly as a result of offline (in-person) discussion meetings. It was agreed that "for decisions that are not rote and routine, it seems highly unlikely that a pre-established hierarchy of authority delegation does or could exist, nor could a pre-established belief that all authorities should be given equal weight".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-60|c2]]</sup> However, it was also agreed that Loiselle's study "have identified at least one aspect of hierarchical authority delegation in epistemic communities",<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-62|c3]]</sup> for "there seem to be instances where some experts occupy privileged positions in the eyes of those delegating authority" and that "alone is sufficient to suggest that hierarchies of authority delegation exists, regardless of of how transient or fixed they might be".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2017-0007#comment-90|c4]]</sup> | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 16:56, 4 November 2018
Accept the definitions of the following subtypes of authority delegation: singular authority delegation, multiple authority delegation, hierarchical authority delegation, and non-hierarchical authority delegation.
The modification was suggested to Scientonomy community by Mirka Loiselle on 19 May 2017.1 The modification was accepted on 23 October 2018.
Preamble
TODO: Sinan, please add the preamble
Modification
Theories To Accept
- Multiple Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017): Community A is said to engage in a relationship of multiple authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to more than one community.
- Singular Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017): Community A is said to engage in a relationship of singular authority delegation over topic x iff community A delegates authority over topic x to exactly one community.
- Non-Hierarchical Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017): A sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated the same degree of authority over topic x.
- Hierarchical Authority Delegation (Loiselle-2017): A sub-type of multiple authority delegation where different communities are delegated different degrees of authority over topic x.
Questions Answered
This modification attempts to answer the following question(s):
- Singular Authority Delegation: What is singular authority delegation? How should it be defined?
- Multiple Authority Delegation: What is multiple authority delegation? How should it be defined?
- Hierarchical Authority Delegation: What is hierarchical authority delegation? How should it be defined?
- Non-Hierarchical Authority Delegation: What is non-hierarchical authority delegation? How should it be defined?
Verdict
The modification was accepted on 23 October 2018. While the notions of singular and multiple authority delegation didn't cause much controversy, the notions of hierarchical and non-hierarchical authority delegation gave rise to notable disagreement among scientonomists. As a result, the modification was in discussion for about a year and a half.c1 Eventually, a consensus emerged mostly as a result of offline (in-person) discussion meetings. It was agreed that "for decisions that are not rote and routine, it seems highly unlikely that a pre-established hierarchy of authority delegation does or could exist, nor could a pre-established belief that all authorities should be given equal weight".c2 However, it was also agreed that Loiselle's study "have identified at least one aspect of hierarchical authority delegation in epistemic communities",c3 for "there seem to be instances where some experts occupy privileged positions in the eyes of those delegating authority" and that "alone is sufficient to suggest that hierarchies of authority delegation exists, regardless of of how transient or fixed they might be".c4
Click on the Discussion tab for comments.
References
- ^ Loiselle, Mirka. (2017) Multiple Authority Delegation in Art Authentication. Scientonomy 1, 41-53. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/28233.