Difference between revisions of "Modification:Sciento-2018-0002"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
|Date Suggested Day=12
 
|Date Suggested Day=12
 
|Date Suggested Approximate=No
 
|Date Suggested Approximate=No
|Authors List=William Rawleigh,
+
|Authors List=William Rawleigh
 
|Resource=Rawleigh (2018)
 
|Resource=Rawleigh (2018)
|Preamble=The currently accepted scientonomic ontology includes two classes of epistemic elements – theories and methods. However, the ontology underlying ''the Encyclopedia of Scientonomy'' includes questions/topics as a basic element of its semantic structure. Ideally there should be no discrepancy between the accepted ontology of theoretical scientonomy and that of the Encyclopedia. This modification suggests including questions in the ontology of scientific change as a distinct class of epistemic elements.
+
|Preamble=The currently accepted scientonomic ontology includes two classes of epistemic elements – [[Theory|theories]] and [[Method|methods]]. However, the ontology underlying ''the Encyclopedia of Scientonomy'' includes [[Question|questions]]/topics as a basic element of its semantic structure. Ideally there should be no discrepancy between the accepted ontology of theoretical scientonomy and that of the Encyclopedia. This modification suggests including questions in the ontology of scientific change as a distinct class of epistemic elements. The addition of questions to the ontology of epistemic elements is intended to bring the accepted scientonomic ontology more closely in line with (a) actual scientific practice, in which questions seem to be distinct elements, and (b) the ontology implicit in the [[Main Page|Encyclopedia of Scientonomy]], where every theory is an answer to a certain question.
|To Accept=Epistemic Elements - Theories Methods and Questions (Rawleigh-2018), Questions as Epistemic Elements (Rawleigh-2018),
+
|Modification=
|To Reject=Epistemic Elements - Theories and Methods (Sebastien-2017),
+
|To Accept=Question Exists, Question Is a Subtype of Epistemic Element (Rawleigh-2018),  
 
|Automatic=No
 
|Automatic=No
 
|Verdict=Accepted
 
|Verdict=Accepted
Line 18: Line 18:
 
|Date Assessed Day=26
 
|Date Assessed Day=26
 
|Date Assessed Approximate=No
 
|Date Assessed Approximate=No
|Verdict Rationale=Following several focused discussions - both in-person and on the discussion page of this modification - it was finally decided that the modification is to be accepted. Three  important clarifications were made. First, it was noted that Rawleigh's only shows that questions cannot be reduced either to methods or to theories, but it is still conceivable "that questions may be functions of both theories and methods simultaneously".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0002#comment-73|c1]]</sup> Second, it was decided that accepting the modification is still warranted, since currently we don't have any idea how questions could be reduced to a conjunction of theories ''and'' methods.<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0002#comment-85|c2]]</sup> Third, it was decided that the question of the [[Status of Questions]] is to be left open. Scientonomists are actively encouraged to pursue the question of possibility of reducing questions to a conjunction of theories and methods.<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0002#comment-85|c3]]</sup>
+
|Verdict Rationale=Following several focused discussions - both in-person and on the discussion page of this modification - it was finally decided that the modification is to be accepted. Three  important clarifications were made. First, it was noted that Rawleigh only shows that questions cannot be reduced either to methods or to theories, but it is still conceivable "that questions may be functions of both theories and methods simultaneously".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0002#comment-73|c1]]</sup> Second, it was decided that accepting the modification is still warranted, since currently we don't have any idea how questions could be reduced to a conjunction of theories ''and'' methods.<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0002#comment-85|c2]]</sup> Third, scientonomists are actively encouraged to pursue the question of possibility of reducing questions to a conjunction of theories and methods.<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0002#comment-85|c3]]</sup>
 +
|Superseded By=
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 20:43, 12 February 2023

Accept the ontology of epistemic elements with theories, methods, and questions as distinct epistemic elements.

The modification was suggested to Scientonomy community by William Rawleigh on 12 May 2018.1 The modification was accepted on 26 September 2018.

Preamble

The currently accepted scientonomic ontology includes two classes of epistemic elements – theories and methods. However, the ontology underlying the Encyclopedia of Scientonomy includes questions/topics as a basic element of its semantic structure. Ideally there should be no discrepancy between the accepted ontology of theoretical scientonomy and that of the Encyclopedia. This modification suggests including questions in the ontology of scientific change as a distinct class of epistemic elements. The addition of questions to the ontology of epistemic elements is intended to bring the accepted scientonomic ontology more closely in line with (a) actual scientific practice, in which questions seem to be distinct elements, and (b) the ontology implicit in the Encyclopedia of Scientonomy, where every theory is an answer to a certain question.

Modification

Theories To Accept

Questions Answered

This modification attempts to answer the following question(s):

Verdict

The modification was accepted on 26 September 2018. Following several focused discussions - both in-person and on the discussion page of this modification - it was finally decided that the modification is to be accepted. Three important clarifications were made. First, it was noted that Rawleigh only shows that questions cannot be reduced either to methods or to theories, but it is still conceivable "that questions may be functions of both theories and methods simultaneously".c1 Second, it was decided that accepting the modification is still warranted, since currently we don't have any idea how questions could be reduced to a conjunction of theories and methods.c2 Third, scientonomists are actively encouraged to pursue the question of possibility of reducing questions to a conjunction of theories and methods.c3

Click on the Discussion tab for comments.

References

  1. ^  Rawleigh, William. (2018) The Status of Questions in the Ontology of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 2, 1-12. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/29651.