Possibility of Scientonomy

How is scientonomy possible?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015) is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available theory on the subject. Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015) states "Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities."

History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 January 2016This is when the community accepted its first answer to the question, Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015), which indicates that the question is itself legitimate.Yes

All Theories

The following theories have attempted to answer this question:
TheoryFormulationFormulated In
Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities.2015
If a theory on this descriptive question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

The following theories have been accepted as answers to this question:
CommunityTheoryAccepted FromAccepted Until
ScientonomyPossibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015)1 January 2016

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

In Scientonomy community, the accepted theory on the subject is Possibility of Scientonomy (Barseghyan-2015). It states: "Scientonomy is possible because the process of scientific change exhibits lawful general regularities." ToDo Read More

Open Questions

The following related topic(s) currently lack an accepted answer:

Related Topics

It has the following sub-topic(s):

Contributors

Paul Patton (100.0%)

Last modified on 30 March 2017, at 14:49