Edit: Scientificity Is a Subtype of Epistemic Stance (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)

What is the supertype class in this subtype/supertype relationship? If the term is not in the list, please first add it in the Definitional Topic category.

What is the subtype class in this subtype/supertype relationship? If the term is not in the list, please first add it in the Definitional Topic category.

Who are the authors of this formulation? If the author is not in the list, please first add the author in Author category.

When was this theory first formulated?

Subtypes of a class can be disjoint or overlapping. For instance, a theory can be either normative, descriptive, or definition; but it can also be core or not core theory of a discipline. The former three are disjoint subtypes of theory, and so are the latter two. However, the former three are overlapping with the latter two, e.g. a descriptive theory can also be a core theory. If the subtype class has any disjoint siblings, enter the basis on which this subtype is distinguished from its disjoint siblings. NOTE: It should follow the phrase "on the basis of", e.g. "semantic content", "the role in a discipline"). The group named "Main" will be listed first among subtypes and the word "Main" will be omitted.

Often formulations need to appear in a standard box with a title and text. Select or upload the image for this formulation.

Provide a detailed description of this theory here. NOTE: The first paragraph of this description will also appear on any other page that cites this theory, so please ensure that the first paragraph contains a succinct exposition of the theory.

Where was this theory first formulated?

Optional. Use only if this formulation somehow owes to discussions outside of the scientonomic tradition. Otherwise leave empty.

Optional. Use only if this formulation is strongly related to previous scientonomic formulations. NOTE: Do not list what theories this theory came to replace as that will be done automatically by the encyclopedia.