Difference between revisions of "Social Agents of Scientific Change"
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Proper definitions to these concepts will help clarify the basic taxonomy for the social agents of scientific change. | Proper definitions to these concepts will help clarify the basic taxonomy for the social agents of scientific change. | ||
− | |Year | + | |Formulated Year=2015 |
|Author=Nicholas Overgaard, | |Author=Nicholas Overgaard, | ||
|Prehistory=Prehistory here | |Prehistory=Prehistory here |
Revision as of 09:57, 28 August 2016
What is the ontology of the social agents of scientific change? How should we define such terms as group, community, scientific community etc.?
Scientonomists study mosaics of theories and methods of certain communities. What is the difference between community and group, or community and scientific community? Proper definitions to these concepts will help clarify the basic taxonomy for the social agents of scientific change.
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Nicholas Overgaard in 2015.
Contents
Broader History
Prehistory here
Scientonomic History
History here
Acceptance Record
All Theories
Accepted Theories
Suggested Modifications
Current Definition
There is currently no accepted taxonomy for the social agents of scientific change.1
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Ontology
Existence
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of .
Disjointness
No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.
Subtypes
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of .
Supertypes
No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of .
Associations
No associations of are currently accepted.
If a question concerning the ontology of is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
If a question concerning the dynamics of is missing, please add it here.
Related Topics
This term is also related to the following topic(s):
References
- ^ Overgaard (2016)