Social Agents of Scientific Change

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Revision as of 09:57, 28 August 2016 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What is the ontology of the social agents of scientific change? How should we define such terms as group, community, scientific community etc.?

Scientonomists study mosaics of theories and methods of certain communities. What is the difference between community and group, or community and scientific community? Proper definitions to these concepts will help clarify the basic taxonomy for the social agents of scientific change.

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Nicholas Overgaard in 2015.

Broader History

Prehistory here

Scientonomic History

History here

Acceptance Record

Our records state that this term has never been accepted by any community.

All Theories

According to our records, no definition of the term has been suggested.If a definition of this term is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no definition of the term has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this term.

Current Definition

There is currently no accepted taxonomy for the social agents of scientific change.1

There is currently no accepted answer to this question.

Ontology

Existence

There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of .

Disjointness

No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.

Subtypes

No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of .

Supertypes

No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of .

Associations

No associations of are currently accepted.


If a question concerning the ontology of is missing, please add it here.

Dynamics

If a question concerning the dynamics of is missing, please add it here.


Related Topics

This term is also related to the following topic(s):

References

  1. ^ Overgaard (2016)