Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Create the page "Law" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]63 bytes (5 words) - 17:35, 7 December 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)]]44 bytes (5 words) - 17:59, 7 December 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]45 bytes (5 words) - 18:00, 7 December 2017
- |Last Name=Law307 bytes (49 words) - 16:50, 7 October 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]63 bytes (5 words) - 08:47, 2 December 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]42 bytes (5 words) - 18:01, 7 December 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)]]44 bytes (5 words) - 06:01, 10 February 2017
- #REDIRECT [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]45 bytes (5 words) - 15:39, 30 September 2016
- #REDIRECT [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)]]42 bytes (5 words) - 15:40, 30 September 2016
- |Title=The First Law |Alternate Titles=the law of scientific inertia4 KB (564 words) - 00:03, 28 February 2024
- |Title=The Second Law |Alternate Titles=the law of theory acceptance9 KB (1,286 words) - 17:07, 27 January 2023
- |Title=The Third Law |Alternate Titles=the law of method employment18 KB (2,630 words) - 15:49, 4 February 2023
- |Title=The Third Law |Alternate Titles=the law of method employment8 KB (1,168 words) - 17:24, 7 May 2023
- |Title=The Zeroth Law |Alternate Titles=the law of compatibility21 KB (3,113 words) - 20:16, 10 February 2023
- #REDIRECT [[Tautological Status of The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]86 bytes (8 words) - 22:00, 19 January 2023
- #REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]69 bytes (8 words) - 22:33, 19 January 2023
- |Conclusion=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...rements".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 129]] Thus, he argues, the second law is a mere explication of what is implicit in the definition of ''employed m752 bytes (102 words) - 19:15, 20 January 2023
- |Title=The First Law for Theories |Formulation File=The First Law for Theories Barseghyan 2015.jpg12 KB (1,712 words) - 17:12, 2 November 2023
- |Author=Michel Callon, Arie Rip, John Law,230 bytes (29 words) - 15:11, 29 March 2018
- |Title=The First Law for Methods |Formulation File=The First Law for Methods Barseghyan 2015.jpg4 KB (541 words) - 13:07, 19 January 2024
Page text matches
- ...e First Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...is a deductive consequence of the first law, the second law, and the third law.1 KB (159 words) - 10:40, 17 January 2024
- |Title=The Law of Method Employment |Formulation File=The Law of Method Employment (Rawleigh-2022).png1 KB (157 words) - 16:26, 30 October 2022
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law for Methods (Barseghyan-2015)664 bytes (87 words) - 20:22, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-2015)668 bytes (87 words) - 20:25, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Theories (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)700 bytes (89 words) - 20:50, 3 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Norms (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023)688 bytes (89 words) - 20:34, 3 January 2024
- |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) ...plit'' theorem is a deductive consequence of the second law and the zeroth law.1 KB (168 words) - 10:48, 17 January 2024
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Pandey-2023) |Subject=The First Law for Questions (Barseghyan-Levesley-2021)708 bytes (89 words) - 20:40, 3 January 2024
- |Premises=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) ...pty mosaic'' theorem follows deductively from the second law and the third law.946 bytes (129 words) - 10:46, 17 January 2024
- |Publisher=British Law: Constitutional Law: Special Topics284 bytes (39 words) - 21:52, 30 November 2017
- |Title=A Compatibility Law and the Classification of Theory Change ...s how the stance of compatibility obtains. Unlike the zeroth law, this new law has empirical content, as it forbids certain conceivable scenarios. Having1 KB (190 words) - 03:29, 22 March 2019
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) |Subject=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018)1 KB (170 words) - 23:20, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is Barseghyan's original second law a tautology?2 KB (228 words) - 22:37, 19 January 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015)1 KB (185 words) - 21:33, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015) |Question=Is Harder's zeroth law a tautology?2 KB (214 words) - 22:44, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) |Question=Is the second law suggested by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan in 2017 a tautology?2 KB (250 words) - 23:02, 19 January 2023
- |Topic=Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Subject=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)2 KB (367 words) - 20:16, 3 January 2024
- |Subject=The Law of Theory Demarcation (Sarwar-Fraser-2018) |Question=Is the law of theory demarcation as formulated by Sarwar and Fraser in 2018 a tautolog2 KB (253 words) - 23:19, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Question=Is the first law suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?2 KB (247 words) - 22:32, 19 January 2023
- |Subject=The Law of Compatibility (Fraser-Sarwar-2018) |Question=Is the law of compatibility suggested by Fraser and Sarwar in 2018 a tautology?2 KB (240 words) - 19:27, 23 January 2023