Difference between revisions of "Status of Disciplinary Boundaries"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Paul Patton (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Topic |Question=How do disciplinary boundaries exist within the scientific mosaic? |Topic Type=Descriptive |Description=The scientific mosaic consists...") |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Question=How do disciplinary boundaries exist within the scientific mosaic? | |Question=How do disciplinary boundaries exist within the scientific mosaic? | ||
|Topic Type=Descriptive | |Topic Type=Descriptive | ||
− | |Description=The [[Scientific Mosaic|scientific mosaic]] consists of the set of all accepted [[Theory|theories]] and employed [[Method|methods]] at some particular time. How do disciplinary boundaries exist within the mosaic | + | |Description=The [[Scientific Mosaic|scientific mosaic]] consists of the set of all accepted [[Theory|theories]] and employed [[Method|methods]] at some particular time. How do disciplinary boundaries exist within the mosaic: are they expressible as theories and/or methods? |
+ | |Parent Topic=Ontology of Scientific Change | ||
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | ||
|Formulated Year=2016 | |Formulated Year=2016 | ||
|Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2016, | |Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2016, | ||
− | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Acceptance Record | {{Acceptance Record |
Revision as of 23:33, 23 January 2017
How do disciplinary boundaries exist within the scientific mosaic?
The scientific mosaic consists of the set of all accepted theories and employed methods at some particular time. How do disciplinary boundaries exist within the mosaic: are they expressible as theories and/or methods?
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan in 2016. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 April 2016 | It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2016. | Yes |
All Theories
The following theories have attempted to answer this question:
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Discipline (Patton-Al-Zayadi-2021) | A discipline is characterized by (1) a non-empty set of core questions Q and (2) the delineating theory stating that Q are the core questions of the discipline. | 2021 |
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
Here is a list of modifications concerning this topic:
Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Verdict | Verdict Rationale | Date Assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sciento-2021-0006 | Scientonomy | 1 August 2021 | Accept new definitions of subquestion, core question, core theory, discipline, delineating theory, subdiscipline, and discipline acceptance. | Open |
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
This question is a subquestion of Ontology of Scientific Change.
This topic is also related to the following topic(s):
References
- a b Godfrey-Smith, Peter. (2003) Theory and Reality. University of Chicago Press.
- ^ Lakatos, Imre. (1970) Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In Lakatos (1978a), 8-101.
- ^ Kuhn, Thomas. (1973) Objectivity, Value Judgement, and Theory Choice. In Kuhn (1977a), 320-339.
- a b c d e Becher, Tony. (1981) Towards a Definition of Disciplinary Cultures. Studies in Higher Education 6 (2), 109-122.