Difference between revisions of "The Second Law is Not a Tautology (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Theory |Title=The Second Law is Not a Tautology |Theory Type=Descriptive |Formulation Text=The second law is not a tautology. |Topic=Tautological Status of the Second Law |A...")
 
Tag: New redirect
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{Theory
+
#REDIRECT [[The Second Law (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017) is Not Tautological (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)]]
−
|Title=The Second Law is Not a Tautology
 
−
|Theory Type=Descriptive
 
−
|Formulation Text=The second law is not a tautology.
 
−
|Topic=Tautological Status of the Second Law
 
−
|Authors List=
 
−
|Formulated Year=2017
 
−
|Description=The reformulation of the second law by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan makes it explicit that the law is not a tautology as it clearly forbids certain logically conceivable courses of events.[[CiteRef::Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan (2017)|pp. 33-34]]
 
−
|Resource=Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan (2017)
 
−
}}
 

Latest revision as of 21:58, 19 January 2023

Redirect to:

References

  1. a b  Patton, Paul; Overgaard, Nicholas and Barseghyan, Hakob. (2017) Reformulating the Second Law. Scientonomy 1, 29-39. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/27158.

Retrieved from "https://www.scientowiki.com/index.php?title=The_Second_Law_is_Not_a_Tautology_(Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)&oldid=18220"