Difference between revisions of "The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|Authors List=Zoe Sebastien, | |Authors List=Zoe Sebastien, | ||
|Year Formulated=2016 | |Year Formulated=2016 | ||
− | |Formulation Text=A method becomes employed when it is deducible from some subset of other employed methods and accepted theories of the time. | + | |Formulation Text=A method becomes employed only when it is deducible from some subset of other employed methods and accepted theories of the time. |
|Description=The [[The Third Law (Barseghyan, 2015)|initial formulation]] of the law, proposed by Barseghyan in ''The Laws of Scientific Change'', stated that a [[Method|method]] becomes [[Method Employment|employed]] only when it is deducible from other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p.132]] In that formulation, it wasn't clear whether employed methods follow from ''all'' or only ''some'' of the accepted theories and employed methods of the time. This led to a logical paradox which this reformulation attempts to solve.[[CiteRef::Sebastien (2016)]] | |Description=The [[The Third Law (Barseghyan, 2015)|initial formulation]] of the law, proposed by Barseghyan in ''The Laws of Scientific Change'', stated that a [[Method|method]] becomes [[Method Employment|employed]] only when it is deducible from other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p.132]] In that formulation, it wasn't clear whether employed methods follow from ''all'' or only ''some'' of the accepted theories and employed methods of the time. This led to a logical paradox which this reformulation attempts to solve.[[CiteRef::Sebastien (2016)]] | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|Accepted by Community=Community:Scientonomy | |Accepted by Community=Community:Scientonomy | ||
|Accepted From=2016 | |Accepted From=2016 | ||
+ | |Accepted Until=2016 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Acceptance Record | {{Acceptance Record |
Revision as of 22:33, 18 August 2016
References
- a b Sebastien, Zoe. (2016) The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/26947.
- ^ Laudan, Larry. (1984) Science and Values. University of California Press.
- a b c Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
- ^ McMullin, Ernan. (1988) The Shaping of Scientific Rationality: Construction and Constraint. In McMullin (Ed.) (1988), 1-47.
- ^ Kuhn, Thomas. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.