Difference between revisions of "The Third Law (Sebastien-2016)"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
|Authors List=Zoe Sebastien,
 
|Authors List=Zoe Sebastien,
 
|Year Formulated=2016
 
|Year Formulated=2016
|Formulation Text=A method becomes employed when it is deducible from some subset of other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.
+
|Formulation Text=A method becomes employed only when it is deducible from some subset of other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.
 
|Description=The [[The Third Law (Barseghyan, 2015)|initial formulation]] of the law, proposed by Barseghyan in ''The Laws of Scientific Change'', stated that a [[Method|method]] becomes [[Method Employment|employed]] only when it is deducible from other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p.132]] In that formulation, it wasn't clear whether employed methods follow from ''all'' or only ''some'' of the accepted theories and employed methods of the time. This led to a logical paradox which this reformulation attempts to solve.[[CiteRef::Sebastien (2016)]]  
 
|Description=The [[The Third Law (Barseghyan, 2015)|initial formulation]] of the law, proposed by Barseghyan in ''The Laws of Scientific Change'', stated that a [[Method|method]] becomes [[Method Employment|employed]] only when it is deducible from other employed methods and accepted theories of the time.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p.132]] In that formulation, it wasn't clear whether employed methods follow from ''all'' or only ''some'' of the accepted theories and employed methods of the time. This led to a logical paradox which this reformulation attempts to solve.[[CiteRef::Sebastien (2016)]]  
  
Line 15: Line 15:
 
|Accepted by Community=Community:Scientonomy
 
|Accepted by Community=Community:Scientonomy
 
|Accepted From=2016
 
|Accepted From=2016
 +
|Accepted Until=2016
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Acceptance Record
 
{{Acceptance Record

Revision as of 22:33, 18 August 2016

References

  1. a b  Sebastien, Zoe. (2016) The Status of Normative Propositions in the Theory of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 1, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/26947.
  2. ^  Laudan, Larry. (1984) Science and Values. University of California Press.
  3. a b c  Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
  4. ^  McMullin, Ernan. (1988) The Shaping of Scientific Rationality: Construction and Constraint. In McMullin (Ed.) (1988), 1-47.
  5. ^  Kuhn, Thomas. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.