Edit: Theory Assessment Outcomes (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Users, editor.

Question Answered:

What question does this theory attempt to answer?

 Theory Assessment Outcomes
Theory Type:

Depending on whatkind of a question this theory is attempting to answer, it can be normative, descriptive, or a definition.

 Descriptive
Subject:

An answer can be construed as an RDF triple that semantically links a subject, a predicate, and an object. The subject of an answer is given by its question.
Predicate:

The predicate of an answer is given by its question.
Title:

Enter a short title for this theory. Two or more theories can have the same title. To distinguish between them, the system will add the name of the authors and year to the page name. IMPORTANT: Please do NOT include the names of the authors or the year, as these will be added automatically.

 Theory Assessment Outcomes
Also Known As:

Optional. If the formulation has alternate names, please indicate them here. For instance, The First Law is also known as The Law of Scientific Inertia.
Completeness:

Indicate if this is a partial or complete answer to the question. Normally, answers to binary questions are complete answers, while answers to open questions are usually partial answers. Use this as a guidance not a strict rule.
Formulation Text:

Give the exact formulation of the theory here.
Author(s):

Who are the authors of this formulation? If the author is not in the list, please first add the author in Author category.

 Paul Patton, Nicholas Overgaard and Hakob Barseghyan
Year of Formulation:

When was this theory first formulated?

 2017
Formulation File:

Often formulations need to appear in a standard box with a title and text. Select or upload the image for this formulation.

 Upload file
Description:

Provide a detailed description of this theory here. NOTE: The first paragraph of this description will also appear on any other page that cites this theory, so please ensure that the first paragraph contains a succinct exposition of the theory.
Source:

Where was this theory first formulated?
Broader History:

Optional. Use only if this formulation somehow owes to discussions outside of the scientonomic tradition. Otherwise leave empty.
Scientonomic History:

Optional. Use only if this formulation is strongly related to previous scientonomic formulations. NOTE: Do not list what theories this theory came to replace as that will be done automatically by the encyclopedia.

YouTube Video

Example

Acceptance Record

Accepted by Community:

Indicate the community where this theory was accepted.
Accepted From:

NOTE: If this is an approximate date, please indicate so.

Era: Year: Month: Day: Approximate?

Indicators of Acceptance:

What kind of historical data makes us believe that the theory was in fact accepted by the community at that time? Please list all the relevant indicators together with the appropriate citations here.
Still Accepted:

Is the theory still accepted?
Accepted Until:

NOTE: If this is an approximate date, please indicate so.

Era: Year: Month: Day: Approximate?

Indicators of Rejection:

What kind of historical data shows that the theory was rejected by the community around that time? Please list all the relevant indicators together with the appropriate citations here.

Cancel

Retrieved from "https://www.scientowiki.com/Theory_Assessment_Outcomes_(Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)"