Local Action Availability
What is local action availability? How should it be defined?
As local epistemic actions are said to be available to some epistemic agents, it is important to define what this availability amounts to.
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Joshua Allen in 2023. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 31 December 2023 | This is when the first definition of the term was suggested, indicating that the term itself is accepted. | Yes |
All Theories
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Local Action Availability (Allen-2023) | A local action A is said to be available to an epistemic agent iff that agent employs the norm “A is permissible/desirable”. | 2023 |
Accepted Theories
Suggested Modifications
Modification | Community | Date Suggested | Summary | Verdict | Verdict Rationale | Date Assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sciento-2023-0007 | Scientonomy | 31 December 2023 | Accept that the a local action A is said to be available to an epistemic agent iff that agent employs the norm “A is permissible/desirable”. Also accept the theorem of local action availability as a deductive consequence of this definition and the law of norm employment: a local epistemic action becomes available to an agent only when its permissibility/desirability is derivable from a non-empty subset of other elements of the agent’s mosaic. | Open | The modification can only become accepted once modification Sciento-2023-0006 becomes accepted. |
Current Definition
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Ontology
Existence
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of instances of local action availability.
Disjointness
No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.
Subtypes
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of local action availability.
Supertypes
No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of local action availability.
Associations
No associations of local action availability are currently accepted.
If a question concerning the ontology of local action availability is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
If a question concerning the dynamics of local action availability is missing, please add it here.