Subtypes of Implicit

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What are the subtypes of implicit?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. The subtypes of Implicit currently accepted in Scientonomy are:

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy28 December 2018The question of Subtypes of Implicit became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Implicit. The publication of Maxim Mirkin's The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic is an indication of the acceptance of the term by the community.Yes

All Theories

The following answers have been added to this encyclopedia:
TheoryFormulationFormulated In
Inexplicable Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)Inexplicable is a subtype of Implicit, i.e. implicit is a supertype of inexplicable.2018
Explicable-Implicit Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)Explicable-Implicit is a subtype of Implicit, i.e. implicit is a supertype of explicable-implicit.2018
If a theory concerning the subtypes of implicit is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

The following theories have been accepted as answers to this question:
CommunityTheoryAccepted FromAccepted Until
ScientonomyInexplicable Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)1 September 2019
ScientonomyExplicable-Implicit Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)1 September 2019

Suggested Modifications

Here is a list of modifications concerning this topic:
Modification Community Date Suggested Summary Date Assessed Verdict Verdict Rationale
Sciento-2018-0011 Scientonomy 28 December 2018 Accept the three-fold distinction between explicit, explicable-implicit, and inexplicable. 1 September 2019 Accepted The consensus on this modification emerged primarily off-line. It was agreed that "the modification should be accepted".c1 It was also agreed "that the three-fold distinction is to be accepted as it introduces a distinction between explicable-implicit and inexplicable and thus contributes to the clarity of discussions concerning implicit and explicit."c2

Current View

In Scientonomy, the accepted subtypes of Implicit are:

Inexplicable Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) states: "Inexplicable is a subtype of Implicit, i.e. implicit is a supertype of inexplicable."

Barseghyan and Mirkin suggest that what is implicit may or may not be explicable.12

Explicable-Implicit Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) states: "Explicable-Implicit is a subtype of Implicit, i.e. implicit is a supertype of explicable-implicit."

According to Barseghyan and Mirkin, at least some implicit epistemic elements are explicable.12

Related Topics

References

  1. a b  Barseghyan, Hakob and Mirkin, Maxim. (2019) The Role of Technological Knowledge in Scientific Change. In Héder and Nádasi (Eds.) (2019), 5-17.
  2. a b  Mirkin, Maxim. (2018) The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic. Scientonomy 2, 39-53. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/29645.