Supertypes of Explicable-Implicit

What are the supertypes of explicable-implicit?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. The following supertype of Explicable-Implicit is currently accepted in Scientonomy:

• Implicit

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):

Community	Accepted From	Acceptance Indicators	Still Accepted	Accepted Until	Rejection Indicators
Scientonomy	28 December 2018	The question of Supertypes of Explicable-Implicit became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Explicable-Implicit. The publication of Maxim Mirkin's The Status of Technological Knowledge in the Scientific Mosaic is an indication of the acceptance of the term by the community.	Yes

All Theories

The following answers have been added to this encyclopedia:

Theory	Formulation	Formulated In
Explicable-Implicit Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)	Explicable-Implicit is a subtype of Implicit, i.e. implicit is a supertype of explicable-implicit.	2018

If a theory concerning the supertypes of explicable-implicit is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

The following theories have been accepted as answers to this question:

Community	Theory	Accepted From	Accepted Until
Scientonomy	Explicable-Implicit Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)	1 September 2019

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

In Scientonomy, the following supertype of Explicable-Implicit is currently accepted:

• Implicit

Explicable-Implicit Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) states: "Explicable-Implicit is a subtype of Implicit, i.e. implicit is a supertype of explicable-implicit."

According to Barseghyan and Mirkin, at least some implicit epistemic elements are explicable.12