Theoretical Scientonomy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
What is theoretical scientonomy? What are the core questions of theoretical scientonomy?
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, Gregory Rupik and Paul Patton in 2016. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of the question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted by a community). This is not to be conflated with the acceptance of the discipline itself. The latter depends on the acceptance of the discipline's delineating theory and its core questions:
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | The subdiscipline of theoretical scientonomy became accepted together with the inception of the discipline of scientonomy. | Yes |
All Core Questions
The following questions have been suggested as core questions of the discipline:
If a core question of the discipline is missing, please click here to add it.
| Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Theoretical Scientonomy | Question Mechanism of Scientific Change is a core question of Theoretical Scientonomy | 2016 |
Accepted Core Questions
According to our records, no question has been accepted as a core question of the discipline.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications concerning the core questions of this discipline.
Current Delineating Theory
The discipline's delineating theory currently specifies no core questions.
Discipline Hierarchy
Subdisciplines
Theoretical Scientonomy currently has no subdisciplines.
Superdisciplines
Theoretical Scientonomy is currently not a subdiscipline of any other discipline.
