Difference between revisions of "Theoretical Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|History= | |History= | ||
|Page Status=Stub | |Page Status=Stub | ||
− | |Editor Notes= | + | |Editor Notes= |
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 10:07, 27 June 2024
This is a theory that states "Theoretical Scientonomy is a subdiscipline of Scientonomy, i.e. scientonomy is a superdiscipline of theoretical scientonomy."
Theoretical Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy was formulated by Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, Gregory Rupik and Paul Patton in 2016.
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
This theory has never been accepted.
Questions Answered
Theoretical Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy is an attempt to answer the following questions: Superdisciplines of Theoretical Scientonomy and Subdisciplines of Scientonomy.
Description
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.