Difference between revisions of "Theoretical Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Hakob Barseghyan moved page Theoretical Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy (Rupik et al.-2016) to Theoretical Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy without leaving a redirect: remove author names) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|History= | |History= | ||
|Page Status=Stub | |Page Status=Stub | ||
| − | |Editor Notes= | + | |Editor Notes= |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 10:07, 27 June 2024
This is a theory that states "Theoretical Scientonomy is a subdiscipline of Scientonomy, i.e. scientonomy is a superdiscipline of theoretical scientonomy."
Theoretical Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy was formulated by Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, Gregory Rupik and Paul Patton in 2016. It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of Theoretical Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy:
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | This is when the whole discipline with its subdisciplines became accepted. | Yes |
Questions Answered
Theoretical Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy is an attempt to answer the following questions: Superdisciplines of Theoretical Scientonomy and Subdisciplines of Scientonomy.
Description
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
