Existence of Scientific Change

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Does scientific change exist?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. The following claim concerning the existence of Scientific Change is currently accepted in Scientonomy:

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 January 2016The question of Existence of Scientific Change became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Scientific Change. This is when the community accepted its first definition of the term, Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015), which indicates that the question is itself considered legitimate.Yes

All Theories

The following answers have been added to this encyclopedia:
TheoryFormulationFormulated In
Scientific Change ExistsThere is such a thing as a scientific change.2015
To add the negative answer to the question, click here.

Accepted Theories

The following theories have been accepted as answers to this question:
CommunityTheoryAccepted FromAccepted Until
ScientonomyScientific Change Exists1 January 2016

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

In Scientonomy, the following claim concerning the existence of Scientific Change is currently accepted:

Scientific Change Exists states: "There is such a thing as a scientific change."

The process of scientific change is the central subject of scientonomy. Its existence is one of the central presuppositions of scientonomy.

Related Topics