Explicable-Implicit Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018)

This is a theory that states "Explicable-Implicit is a subtype of Implicit, i.e. implicit is a supertype of explicable-implicit."

Explicable-Implicit Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) was formulated by Hakob Barseghyan and Maxim Mirkin in 2018.1 It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of Explicable-Implicit Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018):

Community	Accepted From	Acceptance Indicators	Still Accepted	Accepted Until	Rejection Indicators
Scientonomy	1 September 2019	The relation became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the respective suggested modification.	Yes

Suggestions To Accept

Here are all the modifications where the acceptance of this theory has been suggested:

Modification	Community	Date Suggested	Summary	Date Assessed	Verdict	Verdict Rationale
Sciento-2018-0011	Scientonomy	28 December 2018	Accept the three-fold distinction between explicit, explicable-implicit, and inexplicable.	1 September 2019	Accepted	The consensus on this modification emerged primarily off-line. It was agreed that "the modification should be accepted".c1 It was also agreed "that the three-fold distinction is to be accepted as it introduces a distinction between explicable-implicit and inexplicable and thus contributes to the clarity of discussions concerning implicit and explicit."c2

Questions Answered

Explicable-Implicit Is a Subtype of Implicit (Mirkin-Barseghyan-2018) is an attempt to answer the following questions: Supertypes of Explicable-Implicit and Subtypes of Implicit.

Description

According to Barseghyan and Mirkin, at least some implicit epistemic elements are explicable.21

Reasons

No reasons are indicated for this theory.

If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.