Property:Acceptance Indicators

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a property of type text.

Showing 20 pages using this property.
A
The definition became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]].  +
This is when the community accepted its first definition of the term, [[Acceptance Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)]].  +
This question was acknowledged as legitimate in the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2016]].  +
The definition became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the respective [[Modification:Sciento-2017-0012|suggested modification]].  +
The question became accepted with the publication of Overgaard's [[Overgaard (2017)|''A Taxonomy for Social Agents of Scientific Change'']].  +
The idea became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the [[Modification:Sciento-2019-0003|respective modification]].  +
It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018 Fall]].  +
It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2017]].  +
The publication of [[Patton (2019)]] is and indication of the acceptance of the question.  +
This question was acknowledged as legitimate in the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2017]].  +
It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018]].  +
It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018]].  +
The question was raised by Barseghyan in his original formulation of scientonomy [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015) |pp. 99-109]], although he was unable to supply a normative answer.  +
The theory was introduced by Barseghyan in 'The Laws of Scientific Change' [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 109-113]] and became 'de facto' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole theory of scientific change.  +
The community has accepted an answer to this question, Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant facts Barseghyan 2015, and this implies the acceptance of the legitimacy of the question itself.  +
The law became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]].  +
Associations of Acceptance Criteria became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of [[Acceptance Criteria]]. This is when the community accepted its first definition of the term, [[Acceptance Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)]].  +
Associations of Authority Delegation became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of [[Authority Delegation]]. The publication of the article by Overgaard and Loiselle titled [[Overgaard and Loiselle (2016)|Authority Delegation]] is a good indication of acceptance of the question.Overgaard and Loiselle (2016)  +
Associations of Community became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of [[Community]]. The question became accepted with the publication of Overgaard's [[Overgaard (2017)|''A Taxonomy for Social Agents of Scientific Change'']].  +
Associations of Compatibility Criteria became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of [[Compatibility Criteria]].  +