Role of Definitions in Scientific Change

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to: navigation, search

Do definitions play any distinct role in the process of scientific change, or do they only exhibit the exact same patterns as descriptive and normative theories?

There seems to be prima facie evidence to suspect that definitions play a specific role in the process of scientific change. Philosophical and historical studies of conceptual change suggest a complex underlying dynamics.12 Unearthing that dynamics is an important scientonomic task.

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2018.

History

Acceptance Record

Our records state that this question has never been accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by any community.

All Theories

According to our records, no theory has attempted to answer this question. If a theory on this descriptive question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

There is currently no accepted answer to this question.

Related Topics

This topic is a sub-topic of Mechanism of Theory Acceptance.

References

  1. ^  Chi, Michelene T. H. (1992) Conceptual Change within and across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science. In Giere (Ed.) (1992), 129-186.
  2. ^  Chi, Michelene T. H. (2008) Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift. In Vosniadou (Ed.) (2008), 61-82.

Contributors

Hakob Barseghyan (100.0%)