Difference between revisions of "Mechanism of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Theoretical Scientonomy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Page Status=Stub | |Page Status=Stub | ||
|Editor Notes= | |Editor Notes= | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Acceptance Record | ||
| + | |Community=Community:Scientonomy | ||
| + | |Accepted From Era=CE | ||
| + | |Accepted From Year=2016 | ||
| + | |Accepted From Month=January | ||
| + | |Accepted From Day=1 | ||
| + | |Accepted From Approximate=No | ||
| + | |Acceptance Indicators=The claim that the question of the mechanism of scientific change is within the domain of theoretical scientonomy became accepted with the establishment of the community and the discipline. | ||
| + | |Still Accepted=Yes | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Era= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Year= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Month= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Day= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
| + | |Rejection Indicators= | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:12, 29 June 2024
This is a theory that states "Question Mechanism of Scientific Change is a core question of Theoretical Scientonomy."
Mechanism of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Theoretical Scientonomy was formulated by Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, Gregory Rupik and Paul Patton in 2016. It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of Mechanism of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Theoretical Scientonomy:
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | The claim that the question of the mechanism of scientific change is within the domain of theoretical scientonomy became accepted with the establishment of the community and the discipline. | Yes |
Questions Answered
Mechanism of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Theoretical Scientonomy is an attempt to identify a core question of Theoretical Scientonomy.
Description
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
