Difference between revisions of "Theoretical Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Discipline Hierarchy Theory |Parent=Scientonomy |Child=Theoretical Scientonomy |Authors List=Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton |Formulated Yea...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Parent=Scientonomy | |Parent=Scientonomy | ||
|Child=Theoretical Scientonomy | |Child=Theoretical Scientonomy | ||
| − | |Authors List= | + | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton, Gregory Rupik |
|Formulated Year=2016 | |Formulated Year=2016 | ||
|Disjoint Group= | |Disjoint Group= | ||
Revision as of 09:45, 27 June 2024
This is a theory that states "Theoretical Scientonomy is a subdiscipline of Scientonomy, i.e. scientonomy is a superdiscipline of theoretical scientonomy."
Theoretical Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy was formulated by Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, Gregory Rupik and Paul Patton in 2016.
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
This theory has never been accepted.
Questions Answered
Theoretical Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy is an attempt to answer the following questions: Superdisciplines of Theoretical Scientonomy and Subdisciplines of Scientonomy.
Description
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
