Ontology of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Theoretical Scientonomy
This is a theory that states "Question Ontology of Scientific Change is a core question of Theoretical Scientonomy."
Ontology of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Theoretical Scientonomy was formulated by Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, Gregory Rupik and Paul Patton in 2016.1 It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | While in Barseghyan's The Laws of Scientific Change, the question of the ontology of scientific change is discussed without being explicitly formulated, it is safe to say that it was tacitly accepted since the inception of the community as one of the questions of theoretical scientonomy. | Yes |
Questions Answered
Ontology of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Theoretical Scientonomy is an attempt to identify a core question of Theoretical Scientonomy.
Description
The question of what types of epistemic entities, relations, processes, etc. are involved in scientific is one of the central questions of theoretical scientonomy.1
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.
References
- a b Barseghyan, Hakob. (2018) Redrafting the Ontology of Scientific Change. Scientonomy 2, 13-38. Retrieved from https://scientojournal.com/index.php/scientonomy/article/view/31032.