Difference between revisions of "Observational Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|History= | |History= | ||
|Page Status=Stub | |Page Status=Stub | ||
− | |Editor Notes= | + | |Editor Notes= |
}} | }} | ||
{{Acceptance Record | {{Acceptance Record |
Latest revision as of 11:11, 2 July 2024
This is a theory that states "Observational Scientonomy is a subdiscipline of Scientonomy, i.e. scientonomy is a superdiscipline of observational scientonomy."
Observational Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy was formulated by Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, Gregory Rupik and Paul Patton in 2024. It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of Observational Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy:
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | This is when the whole discipline with its subdisciplines became accepted. | Yes |
Questions Answered
Observational Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy is an attempt to answer the following questions: Subdisciplines of Scientonomy and Superdisciplines of Observational Scientonomy.
Description
Reasons
No reasons are indicated for this theory.
If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.