Difference between revisions of "Observational Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Discipline Hierarchy Theory |Parent=Scientonomy |Child=Observational Scientonomy |Authors List=Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton |Formulated Y...")
 
Line 12: Line 12:
 
|Page Status=Stub
 
|Page Status=Stub
 
|Editor Notes=
 
|Editor Notes=
 +
}}
 +
{{Acceptance Record
 +
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
 +
|Accepted From Era=CE
 +
|Accepted From Year=2016
 +
|Accepted From Month=January
 +
|Accepted From Day=1
 +
|Accepted From Approximate=No
 +
|Acceptance Indicators=This is when the whole discipline with its subdisciplines became accepted.
 +
|Still Accepted=Yes
 +
|Accepted Until Era=
 +
|Accepted Until Year=
 +
|Accepted Until Month=
 +
|Accepted Until Day=
 +
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
 +
|Rejection Indicators=
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 11:09, 2 July 2024

This is a theory that states "Observational Scientonomy is a subdiscipline of Scientonomy, i.e. scientonomy is a superdiscipline of observational scientonomy."

Observational Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy was formulated by Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, Gregory Rupik and Paul Patton in 2024. It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of Observational Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy:
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy1 January 2016This is when the whole discipline with its subdisciplines became accepted.Yes

Questions Answered

Observational Scientonomy Is a Subdiscipline of Scientonomy is an attempt to answer the following questions: Subdisciplines of Scientonomy and Superdisciplines of Observational Scientonomy.

Description

Reasons

No reasons are indicated for this theory.

If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.