Ontology of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Scientonomy

This is a theory that states "Question Ontology of Scientific Change is a core question of Scientonomy."

Ontology of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Scientonomy was formulated by Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan, Gregory Rupik and Paul Patton in 2016.1 It is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available answer to the question.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of Ontology of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Scientonomy:

Community	Accepted From	Acceptance Indicators	Still Accepted	Accepted Until	Rejection Indicators
Scientonomy	1 January 2016	While in Barseghyan's The Laws of Scientific Change, the question of the ontology of scientific change is discussed without being explicitly formulated, it is safe to say that it was tacitly accepted since the inception of the community as one of the questions of scientonomy.	Yes

Questions Answered

Ontology of Scientific Change Is a Core Question of Scientonomy is an attempt to identify a core question of Scientonomy.

Description

The question of what types of epistemic entities, relations, processes, etc. are involved in scientific is one of the central questions of scientonomy.1

Reasons

No reasons are indicated for this theory.

If a reason supporting this theory is missing, please add it here.